WAN Awards 2018

THURSDAY 21 JUNE 2018

SEARCH   
 
WAN Jobs
News Review
Podcasts
WAN Urban Challenge
WAN Awards
Previous Next
 

Moscow Agglomeration Master Plan Strategy

Monday 27 Feb 2012
 

Moving Moscow

 
Moscow Agglomeration Master Plan Strategy by WAN Editorial
Courtesy of RIA Novosti 
 
Moscow Agglomeration Master Plan Strategy by WAN Editorial Moscow Agglomeration Master Plan Strategy by WAN Editorial
Your comments on this project

No. of Comments: 1

Add comments | More comments

01/03/12 peter hancock, Maseru
Having studied Moscow as part of my PhD thesis on capital city urban design, the historic core, formed by the triangular configuration of the Kremlin (or citadel), located at a strategic bend in the Moskva river; together with the ring of monasteries which punctuate the southern perimeter of the city., form the historic and spiritual bases of the city's development. The modern concentric planning rings, with their related radial road arteries, suggest that development along more radial lines, in the form of smaller satellite appendages, spaced at intervals around the outer perimeter of the city, might have been a more appropriate concept, rather than the single massive development planned to the south-west of Moscow, which may have the effect of curtailing much-needed development in other sectors, such as the northern, eastern and western perimeters of the city.
Click for more ...
 
Editorial

Shortlist announced for Moscow Agglomeration Master Plan Strategy 


Last week, ten diverse groups of designers, academics, urban design specialists and engineers were selected by the Architectural Department of Moscow City Government as a shortlist for the Moscow Agglomeration Masterplan Strategy. This colossal scheme will expand the boundary of the Russian capital to incorporate 148,000 hectares of land to the south-west of the city, with the ten shortlisted partnerships presented with the task of preparing concept ideas within the next six months. These concepts will then be placed on public display following a review in September 2012.

Seventy design groups entered the competition and the ten finalists have been drawn from a wide variety of specialist spheres and geographical locations. The shortlist includes: Moscow Architectural Institute with Devereux Architects; OMA with Strelka Institute, Project Meganom, Siemens AG and McKinsey & Company; Professor Andrey Chernihov with Juul-Frost Architects, Diller Scofidio + Renfro, McAdam Architects and Ginzburg Architects; and Ricardo Bofill with Barcelona Regional Agency for Urban Development.

Certain practices have proven their worth in the city before, with McAdam Architects conceptualising the masterplan for a 15,000-strong town of Nikolo-Khovanskoye in the Moscow region, Wilmotte & Associes completing the restoration of the Kremlevesky in Moscow’s Red Square and OMA designing the highly successful Strelka Institute with whom they are entering the competition. There is a chance that the Moscow City Government may not select a complete group as the stand-alone winner but cherry-pick the strongest individuals and practices on the shortlist and form a new collective of superior thinkers.

Professor Brian Evans, Partner at Gillespies, said: “We have been privileged to work in Moscow for 7 years now, collaborating with Group Ark of Moscow, Urban Design Associates of Pittsburgh and John Thompson & Partners (JTP) London. When the competition was announced we immediately understood the need for strategic thinking at the regional level, and were also delighted when Prof Larry Beasley agreed to join us to provide strategic planning advice. This is a prestigious project in a highly competitive field. We are in Moscow now for preliminary meetings with Moscow City and with Group Ark, our Moscow partners.”

Projects of this mammoth scale are not uncommon in Russia as Tanya Kalinina, Director at McAdam Architects, told WAN: “St Petersburg was built from scratch by Tsar Peter the Great at the beginning of the 18th century, and became the Imperial Capital of Russia for almost 200 years. After the revolution central government bodies were moved (back) to Moscow.

“During the 20th century Moscow itself was built in waves of identifiable mass construction as its population grew - industrial and social developments of the twenties and thirties, housing and ministries of the Stalinist era, mass housing of the sixties, and recent development of new suburbs, increased the population of the concentrically-planned city to over 10 million inhabitants in recent years. This situation, together with a tenfold increase in private transport has brought the city to a complete standstill.

“The scale of the problem is such that the way forward has to be radical. It is not feasible to adapt the existing city and infrastructure to resolve the problem and it is completely impracticable to continue its concentric growth. New Moscow will require a new urban direction whilst providing a sustainable and robust planning model and a geographical addition to the Russian Capital which acts as a symbol of development for a New Russia.”

Sian Disson
News Editor

WAN Editorial
worldarchitecturenews.com

More projects by this architect

BREXIT

Sea Lanes

Charles Rennie Mackintosh

Heathrow expansion

How will VR, AR, MR and AI technology impact the AEC community?

More Projects

 
Reinventing Cities
ECOWAN
 

Click here to view the NEWS IN PICTURES tablet site