WAN Jobs
News Review
WAN Urban Challenge
WAN Awards
Previous Next

Cost saving scandal casts shadow on future of solar power

Tuesday 03 Jan 2012

Every silver cloud has a black lining…

Cost saving scandal casts shadow on future of solar power by WAN Editorial
Your comments on this project

No. of Comments: 4

Add comments | More comments

20/01/12 Dion, London
I agree. This is ridiculous. The government has encouraged large solar projects and now companies are realising it wasn't such a great idea. The government needs to back these innovations and even encourage better solar technology for the future. As well as encouraging other energy technology. There is something drastically wrong here and as a avid fan of renewable technology we need to start asking government MP's what is it all about if they keep moving the goal posts all the time just as you reach it. My neighbour who is retired just spent a load of money on filling their roof with panels and what a horrible thought but they probably won't be with us once the payback period is hit. Something really wrong in this country at the moment.
Click for more ...
05/01/12 Michael Hammond, London
I think a change in Government policy to one that is totally at odds with its public position is pretty scandalous.

Whether green should compete with "black" energy on cost grounds is an interesting proposition and takes the debate into new waters...

Michael Hammond
Editor at WAN
04/01/12 baxter, corona
The only solution is that green energy compete with black energy. The green systems are so inefficient that no amount of FIT will ever cover the cost of the scheme as long as the money is spent on the installation and not the research. As to green house gasses, we will never overcome this problem as long as the majority of the population of this planet is using dung to heat their homes and food. I point to the smog in China and India as an example. The solution to global warming starts at the end of your finger, what changes are you willing to make to reduce your impact, how sustainable is you house hold.
Click for more ...
04/01/12 Paul Harris, Santa Rosa, Ca
First of all, I don't see this as a "scandal". That's a pretty extreme headline. Scandal implies wrongdoing, this appears to be a change in government policy.
Second, as I understand it, FIT (feed-in-tariff) pays for energy generated and fed into the electrical grid. What is not explained is what % of the FIT is the going rate to buy electricity and what % is a subsidy to make the cost of building the plant viable. Third; the idea of a government subsidizing something so it is economically viable in the marketplace is a familiar concept to most people. Its used in most industries, especially energy, nuclear power for instance, and transportation, container shipping for another example. I agree it's not a good idea to change the subsidy part way thru a contract if that is what has happened in the UK. However the power plant shown is in Spain. Not enough specifics warrants the alarm the article implies.
Click for more ...

Cost saving scandal casts shadow on future of solar power 

I’ve often been described as an eternal optimist, and am happy to be seen in such a light, so writing these words on January the first 2012 almost physically hurts. The article I’ve just read started off as a brilliant good news story, the world’s largest solar plant powers up, [UK Independent Jan 1st] (as first reported in WAN 20th February 2008). It features an amazing achievement of science and commerce.

The Andasol project in Seville, Spain is refreshingly original, and unlike many wind farm installations, this project will be highly efficient. Utilising an area equivalent of some 210 football pitches, the €350m scheme uses Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) technology which focuses the Sun’s rays into a traditional turbine (fed by natural springs of course) to produce 150 MW annually, saving some 500,000 tonnes of carbon along the way. The project is audacious in its scale and bristling with innovation, such as being able to generate power eight hours after the sun has gone by storing heat in banks of salt and having collectors that track the sun.

So far so good, so what’s the problem?

The problem is the current financial crisis. Undermined by the Euro crisis and general lack of funds, Governments are inevitably scrutinising every cost, every budget, looking for potential savings. And unfortunately they have found a great one. Tucked away, out of sight of the man in the street (and dare I say voter), is the innocuous sounding feed-in tariff (FIT). Ask your mum, or your kids, it’s just not out there.

Unfortunately the FIT is the bed rock, the very foundation of every sustainable energy (even wind farms) initiative. Within the FIT typically lies a vital subsidy for (renewable) power generation and the rate that most government regulated utility bodies buy in green energy; it is defacto the one number that makes a scheme viable or unviable. To be or not or not be.

You might expect this tariff to be fixed for the length of the expected return on investment for the capital required to create such projects, but no. To give you an idea of just how precarious this rate is, the UK Government has just halved the published rate for solar power.

This unprecedented action triggered an immediate outcry and a legal challenge by Friends of the Earth and two solar companies who argued that the government's decision to cut the FIT from 43.3p to 21p with only a few weeks' notice was premature and unlawful, and has led to unfinished or planned projects being abandoned. A high court judge ruled the rash decision 'legally flawed'. The ruling opens the door for a judicial review that could force the government to delay its plans, potentially allowing thousands more people to claim the higher subsidy.

But all this will only delay the axe; cash-strapped Governments everywhere are desperate to cut budgets and the environment is low hanging fruit.

To add a touch of reality, from my window as I write this, I can see my neighbour’s solar panels, installed at great cost, less than three months ago. Hugely ugly of course, but that’s another story. Their payback time for the project had they installed it now would have doubled. Possibly taking it beyond the lifespan of the PV panels… yes, you’ve worked it out too, making the project totally unviable.

Tinkering with the FITs will inevitably undermine all the good work being done by initiatives such as Andasol and ultimately could unravel the entire green energy movement.

Michael Hammond
Editor in Chief at WAN

WAN Editorial

More projects by this architect

Tech Spot #111 Climate Tile

Genoa bridge collapse

Bridge collapse

Festival collapse

Lost 20th century buildings illustrations

More Projects

Reinventing Cities

Click here to view the NEWS IN PICTURES tablet site