World Architecture Day 2014

THURSDAY 24 APRIL 2014

SEARCH   
 
 
World Architecture Day 2014
 
World Architecture Day 2014
Previous Next
 
British Museum Extension, London, United Kingdom 
Wednesday 05 Aug 2009
 
Rogers design not sustainable 
 
© Hayes Davidson and Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners 
 
Your comments on this project

No. of Comments: 3

Add comments | More comments

17/08/10 samantha, zejtun
Although this proposal has currently been rejected it does not mean that it won't be in the future approved. It is about following sustainable standards against the measures which have been already set. Afterall, all our museums have a responsibility in becoming more sustainable in the long term. Especially if there is an opportunity to do so. It is through this that we not only educate those who work within these museums but, also the visitors who come through the front door.
Click for more ...
12/08/09 Anthony Hyland, Durham
Whatever the merits of the RSHP scheme, I have little sympathy with the BM. In Foster's masterly scheme for the Great Court, the BM had one of the most iconic cultural environments in London: was the BM dissatisfied with the service they received from Foster? and why, and what way? We deserve to know..
Click for more ...
11/08/09 HARR, Miami
Is there a score list ?
Is there a royal hand in this ?
Is there recourse for the architects ?
Is this the second step in Rogers' demise in the UK ?
 

Editorial

'Excessive bulk' of British Museum extension doesn't pass Camden Council sustainability standards 

Camden Council in London last month put paid to Richard Rogers' current design for the extension to the British Museum by refusing planning permission. Now, almost two weeks on, they have released their reasoning behind the decision and advise: "The proposed alterations to the listed building are considered harmful to its special architectural and historic interest and the merits of the scheme are not considered to outweigh this harm."

With a weighting of just 5 to 4 members of the panel, the application was refused and the reasons given cite the design's 'excessive bulk' as a contributing factor in the decision as well as the absence of several legal agreement particularly relating to sustainable measures including tree replanting, and securing pedestrian and environmental improvements to prevent an increase in un-sustainable transport use.

"The proposed development, in the absence of a legal agreement requiring for the development to achieve a BREEAM rating of 'very good' and for the sustainability measures detailed for the north-west development and the site wide energy strategy, would fail to be sustainable in its use of resources," reads the report advising that this is contrary to the council's energy policies.

While Rogers Stirk Harbour and Partners advised they would not comment on the matter, the British Museum advised of their disappointed in the decision releasing a statement saying: "We thought we had made a compelling case which drew a balance between our responsibility to our great buildings, the historic environment, the Museum’s collection and the public benefits that would flow from this scheme. The case was supported by English Heritage and CABE, and had been recommended for approval by Camden officers.

We regret that the members of Camden Council’s Development Control Committee, by a majority of one, chose not to grant planning permission for the proposed development. The need for the benefits the scheme would provide has not gone away."

Now upon delivery of the formal reasons for refusal, the British Museum will consider their next steps for the scheme.

Niki May Young
News Editor

Key Facts

Status Planning
Value 0(m€)
Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners
www.rsh-p.com

More projects by this architect

Caracas Stadium

London School of Economics and Political Science

8 Chifley

Leadenhall Building (The Cheesegrater)

Las Arenas

More Projects

Latest Jobs in London

Senior Project Architect - Studio Manager

Marketing and Submissions Coordinator

 
ECOWAN