WAN Awards

MONDAY 22 DECEMBER 2014

SEARCH   
 
 
WAN Mobile
 
WAN Mobile
Previous Next
 

Beijing Olympics building overview, Beijing, China

Monday 04 Aug 2008
 

Olympics delivered...

 
National Stadium by Herzog and De Meuron aka the 'Bird's Nest' 
 
Your comments on this project

No. of Comments: 0

Add comments | More comments

Be the first to comment
 

Editorial

With three days to go WAN analyses the many grand architectural statements within the immense 2,800-acre Olympic park: 

Much controversy has surrounded the awarding of the Olympic Games to Beijing throughout its years of preparation. But now with just three days to go at least we can be sure of one thing: Beijing has delivered its Olympic stadia. So what are the physical spectacles visitors to China's capital can expect to see come 8 August?

Undoubtedly the showstopper is the much-reported and stunning National Stadium by Herzog and De Meuron. The Swiss masters’ 91,000-seater arena has caused controversy itself - while China has promised to deliver a 'Green Olympics', the stadium's complex lattice facade uses far more steel than is structurally necessary. But nevertheless it has become a symbol of the games and the ambitions of modern China.

Slightly less photographed, but perhaps more sustainable, is the National Aquatic Centre designed by Australian architects PTW. Inspired by soap bubbles, the centre uses ETFE - the same plastic cladding used in Cornwall’s Eden Project. The durable material allows natural light into the interior and has better insulating properties than glass.

An even lesser-known gem is the Basketball Gymnasium, by Beijing Architecture Research Institute. With its gold-coloured aluminium cladding, the tactile façade appears to have been built with bamboo.

Although not a sporting venue, one of the site’s most important buildings is Pei Zhu’s Olympics control centre, Digital Beijing. Composed of monolithic grey slabs, the centre can look austere in daylight but comes alive when the gash-like openings are illuminated at night.

Beijing’s new tennis centre is the antithesis of Wimbledon’s Centre Court, the equivalent venue for the 2012 Olympics. While London’s hallowed court is an elegant no-frills affair, the Chinese version resembles a huge lotus flower with 12 concrete ‘petals’ and natural ventilation.

Other newly built venues include the curved roofed National Indoor Stadium, designed by German firm Gloeckner, the flying saucer-esque Laoshan Velodrome for cycling, by Schürmann Architects, and the Shooting Range Hall by Zhuang Weimin.

The park’s landscaping is suitably monumental for the capital of communist China. But the lack of subtle urban planning could harm the legacy of the games. According to The Times’ architecture critic, Tom Dyckhoff, the Olympic Green is “relentless in its overbearing scale, dreariness and inhumanity…full of fascistic plazas, crummy detailing and feeble set pieces.”

The design of the Olympic master plan is credited to US firm Sasaki, yet the practice appears to disassociate itself from the implemented landscape. A statement on the company’s website portfolio said: “Sasaki had no involvement in the design and implementation of the final landscape for the Beijing Olympics.”

London’s Olympic master plan, by LDA Design and Hargreaves Associates, features two different phases – a built-up ‘games mode’ and a leafy ‘legacy mode’ with lush parkland, wetlands, and open water. Londoners should hope that the planning team does not shun responsibility for the end product.

Oliver Ephgrave
Reporter

Key Facts

Status Complete
Value 0(m€)
Were you involved in this scheme?
WAN Editorial

More projects by this architect

Holiday Reading

Millharbour Village

Guggenheim Helsinki Design Competition

Case Study: The Safety Letterbox Company

Mackintosh Building, Glasgow School of Art

More Projects

Latest Jobs in Beijing

Senior Design Project Manager - Hospitals

 
Vola
ECOWAN
 

Click here to view the NEWS IN PICTURES tablet site